Become a member of Opinno on LinkedIn Like Opinno on Facebook Follow Opinno on Twitter Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • EN
  • ES
  • About
  • Opinno Capital
  • Opinno.org
  • Contact
  • Press
Opinno | Open Innovation
  • OISG
  • Network
  • Events
  • Media
  • All Posts
  • Web & Mobile
  • Cleantech
  • Biotechnology
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Innovation

Innovator Spotlight: Innovation in Quality Management

By Jesus Perdomo Ortiz on Nov 28, 2011 | 1 comment
Tweet

Dr. Jesus Perdomo Ortiz

Jesus Perdomo Ortiz is a professor of business administration at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Bogota, Colombia. There, he specializes in innovation and how to unify administration with design.

Quality management, as many other types of management, acquired prestige in Japanese production systems. However, in a curious twist, its guru was an American engineer. Edwards Deming was trained in the United States and developed methods of statistical quality control at Western Electric. It is unclear how he changed his professional image from quality control to quality management, but this act transformed him into a guru of and, I think, a high priest of Total Quality Management.

Today, after three decades, the Total Quality Management religion is kept alive in the world of business and as a research topic. However, it has not gone untouched by the ever present problem of management fads, those well-learned prayers left by companies: the ISO 9000 and Six Sigma models. Moreover, quality and nothing more is today a management mantra that guides managers and the decision making process.

Quality litmus tests should produce beneficial effects. Indeed, business practices and academia have shown that routine implementation of work based on quality improve organizational processes and have positive effects on business performance. Of course, there is prayer without faith, and therefore quality certification is often the only sign that protects us from being rejected from the flock.

Among the multiple effects of corporate well being, quality has a little explored and studied advantage: innovation. It is well known that a comprehensive and quality management system improves customer satisfaction, work motivation, productivity and ultimately the profitability of the business. That is, quality produces the expected effects of Deming’s 14 principles or commandments when implemented. However, Deming left out of his sacred tablet’s 14 principles the guiding principle par excellence: continuous innovation.

It was Andrea Gabor, Deming’s disciple and biographer, who discovered the following command: “Quality control, elimination and improvement of the production process are merely the price of entry into the challenge of competition … finally the job of management is to tune the whole system to be able to make the jump from continuous improvement to continuous innovation in all new product categories that the consumer has not even contemplated.”

Interpreting as business principals: Quality control is only an entry price to the market and continuous improvement (Kaisen) must give way to continuous innovation. The Catechism of complete quality is well summarized, and like “love thy neighbor,” the believer in quality must “love thine innovation.”

Related posts:

  1. MONAMI 2010 brings the Best on Mobile Networks and its Management
  2. TR35 Spain Spotlight: Damia Tormo, 30
  3. TR35 Spain Spotlight: Xabier Uribe-Etxebarria, 30
  4. TR35 Spain Spotlight: Javier Agüera, 19
  5. TR35 Spain Spotlight: Teresa Gonzalo, 33
1 Comment
  1. Mushtaq Elahi
    June 1, 2012

    Well its a nice post and I would like to request that if possible can you please mention the source of the quote”Andrea Gabor, Deming’s disciple and biographer, who discovered the following command: “Quality control, elimination and improvement of the production process are merely the price of entry into the challenge of competition … finally the job of management is to tune the whole system to be able to make the jump from continuous improvement to continuous innovation in all new product categories that the consumer has not even contemplated.” so that we cab read it in more detial.

    Secondaly i think personally few things in Innovation literature require clarifcation and absolute sense, Can you please very kindly from your experience distinguish between terms such as Product or process innovation (Consider the defination of Oslow manual 2005), secondaly many authors treat Innovativeness (Product innovativeness and process innovativeness) similar to Innovation capability and while measuring it use Oslow defination.

    some authors define it as technological innovation *agian using defination of olsow maual 2005,), and then neausre it as performance. To me you can measure capability as if an organization has made successfull innovations it means it has necessary capability to innovate or measure innovation capability as asking questions such as have you done any process or product innovation over the alst few years etc.

    Do you agree to above and if so in one of your articles you have said AC is same as measuring innovation , but to me AC is a capability that leads to other capabilities that make you to innovate.

    Please comment .

    Mushtaq Elahi
    PhD Student

    reply
Leave a Reply
Click here to cancel reply.

Connect with Facebook

 Banners

Calendar

Events Calendar

  March 2013
  Innovators Under 35 Spain Launch
  Cleantech Open Spain Launch

TR35 France Award Ceremony Link

  April 2013
  Innovators Under 35 Colombia Launch
  Innovators Under 35 Peru Launch

  Cleantech Open Colombia Launch

  May 2013
  Emtech Mexico 2013
  Innovators Under 35 Mexico Launch

  Innovators Under 35 Chile Launch

  Innovators Under 35 Argentina y Uruguay
  Launch

Twitter Feed

FEATURED EVENT: EMTECH SPAIN

About
  • About Opinno
  • Team
  • Careers
OISG
Network
  • San Francisco
  • Madrid
  • More
Events
  • Competitions
  • Business Trips
  • Conferences
Media
  • Opinno Blog
  • Tech Review.es

 

Copyright © 2013 Opinno. All rights reserved.

Site by Remedie Studio.